They Wouldn’t Have Stopped the Zeros in 1941

Gunship1-w.jpgbut I’d guess these fully-autonomous robot helicopters with 300-rpm automatic shotguns are just the first step towards a fleet of 24/7 robot aircraft that actually could prevent an aerial assault on a sensitive target like Pearl Harbor — or, say, the Pentagon.

Gee, what could we call this fleet — I’m thinking something catchy like “SkyNet.”
On a completely unrelated note, the Sarah Connor Chronicles start up in January.

h/t: Survivalblog.

This entry was posted in Life in the Atomic Age. Bookmark the permalink.

7 Responses to They Wouldn’t Have Stopped the Zeros in 1941

  1. mech says:

    Heh, My brother has a little part in the Sarah Conner Chronicles.

    Two of my favorite things, Firearms and UAVs.

  2. yatalli says:

    They could also be used to discourage folks from improving their marksmanship deep in forests too. Potentially a scary development as well.

  3. Anthony L. says:

    Good point, Yatalli, but I don’t think the US MIL is quite ready to get itself involved with surpressing constitutional rights. They *do* fight and serve for their country and founding charter. I rather believe that if they were instructed to participate in operations against their countrymen, there would be a lot of dissent and desertion, unless it was for a *very*, VERY good reason. Having said that, I cannot conceive of any good reasons. Keep ’em in the X ring…

  4. David says:

    Anthony, you’re quite right and I’m not thinking the military would do any such thing. I DO get nervous when we start arming robots that can be “let loose” to operate COMPLETELY AUTONOMOUSLY — no human controller — as these can. Read the article; it’s discussed a bit past the midway point.

    I’ll just say the programming REALLY needs to be debugged on these babies before giving the “run” command.

  5. Anthony L. says:

    Roger that David.

  6. Rivrdog says:

    There isn’t a low-flying UAV out there that is good enough in the autonomous mode to avoid directed weapons fire….yes, if you bring one down, the controller will know where it went down, but if you do a “shoot and scoot”, you’ve killed the bird and it won’t fulfill it’s mission.

    When our dot gov starts a program of spying on us with UAVs, look for many of them to end up as broken parts suitable for recycling.

  7. Pingback: Random Nuclear Strikes » This is what your MBR is for

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.