Random Nuclear Strikes

The JunkYardBlog has a link to an interesting piece of actual investigative journalism. It deals with Terry Nichols role in the Oklahoma City Bombing and about the FBI/ATFE/whatever only recently finding bomb making materials at Nichols’ residence almost a decade after the last time they searched it. I knew the alphabet soup agencies were sloppy and/or lazy, but geez louise!

Anyway, the article liked to above also goes a little deeper into what Nichols might have been doing on his trip to the Phillipines shortly before the attack on the Federal Center in OKC.

It points to the fact that the mastermind behind the 1993 WTC bombing was operating out of the Philippines at the time and gives food for thought on that subject, among other things.

While I am not normally one to entertain conspiracy theories, but I keep having a tugging thought in the back of my head that says the Clinton Administration knew all this about McVeigh and Nichols but chose to keep it under wraps so as to not have to go to war with the Islamofascists and ruin the economic prosperity of the mid-90’s with a war.

With that plan, they could not only make the federal hunting of white men with guns their #1 priority, they could also play a weak connection to a minor league white supremacist group to the hilt.

It just seems like too close a play from their book to be completely disallowed out of hand.

But then again, there are way to many independent parties in this game to not have any of that leak out if it were true.

But I’m not saying it would surprise me if it was.

It looks like Floridians will finally be getting some decent gun laws.

Of course, the AP twerp who wrote this article about the proposed law not only plays it like the sky is falling, but is too chickenshit to sign his name.

People who feel threatened anywhere they have a legal right to be — even on the street or at a baseball game — could “meet force with force” to defend themselves without fear of prosecution or liability under a bill passed overwhelmingly Tuesday by the Florida House.

The measure essentially extends a right Floridians already have in their home or car. Under present law, however, people attacked anywhere else are supposed to do what they can to avoid escalating the situation and can use deadly force only after they’ve tried to retreat.

“I’m sorry, people, but if I’m attacked I shouldn’t have a duty to retreat,” said the bill’s sponsor, state Rep. Dennis Baxley. “That’s a good way to get shot in the back.”

The measure passed 94-20. It had already passed the Senate and now heads to Gov. Jeb Bush, who has not said whether he will sign it. It was the top priority of the National Rifle Association in Florida this year.

Baxley said that if people have the clear right to defend themselves without having to worry about legal consequences, criminals will think twice.

Damn right, they’ll think twice. Which is doubling the number of times they currently think about it.

I cannot for the life of me remember where I saw this last night, but if I find it somewhere this morning, I’ll credit it.

In the House of Representatives

H.R. 698: Citizenship Reform Act of 2005 – Amends the Immigration and Nationality Act to limit automatic citizenship at birth to a child born in the United States who: (1) was born in wedlock to a parent either of whom is a U.S. citizen or national, or is an alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence who maintains such residence; or (2) was born out of wedlock to a mother who is a U.S. citizen or national, or is an alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence who maintains such residence.
Defines “born in wedlock” to exclude common law marriages.

Call your Reps today and get this back in motion. It was introduced on Feb 9 and has been sitting in the Subcommittee on Immigration, Border Security, and Claims since March 2nd.

This is the real deal and it can become law if enough folks are pushing it.

My Rep is Baghdad Jim McDermott, but I’ve called his office anyway.

I discovered this via David Neiwert’s blog, Orcinus.

You remember David, he’s the guy who can’t figure out who the real fascists are, but says he holds the definitive knowledge anyway.

Oh and if you do support this bill I’m sure Mr. Neiwert will consider you a bigot, and that is reason enough for me.

But what he doesn’t understand that coming to the US illegally shouldn’t be beneficial, it should be detrimental. Only LEGAL immigration should be beneficial. I know that is a hard concept for a one worlder to fathom, but just give it a shot, mmkay Dave?