Kiss Of Smeg

I’m sure we all remember the picks by the Kos Kommandos for the 2004 election and their humiliating defeat when every single one of them lost.

Kos sure knows how to pick a loser. And he did it again this week.

There was a special election in the 48th CD of California yesterday. The top three contenders were John Campbell (R), Steve Young (D)and Jim Gilchrist (I).

On Tuesday, Kos picked Steve Young to win, saying that Minutemen co-founder Gilchrist could easily split the (R) vote off from Campbell, handing Young the victory in the heavily Republican district.

Why did he think this even though a number of factors were showing it to be impossible? Because if he has nothing else, Kos has his hatred for Republicans to grandstand on. Kos described Gilchrist as a Xenophobe and “Anti-Brown-Immigrants type� that caused the Repubs to spend a whole $250K on this race.

Yeah, you see where this is going, right? The results were Campbell 44.7%, Young 28% and Gilchrist 25%.

Now 25% is nothing to sneeze at when you figure all the times that the guy got called a racist during that election contest. But when Kos’ pick only got 3% more than that guy, I think he had his hopes too high. Campbell could have dropped seven percentage points to either of the other candidates and still won decisively.

What I do hope these results lead to is the Republican Party taking a look at their national immigration policy after Gilchrist kept their candidate to below 50%. This is one guy I wouldn’t mind carpetbagging around after soft on immigration Repubs.

I don’t count an endorsement from Kos being the ‘Kiss of Death’ to his chosen candidates, mostly because I won’t give him such a grand title. But I would give him the one in the title of this post.

Definition of the term Smeg, for those not in the know.

Posted in The Left is Never Right | 1 Comment

Market Forces

Karol at Alarming News find us a link to the Simon’s Brain Blog post where Simon gets fed up with his co-op food center. With the people, with the poor quality of service as well as the more often than not poor quality of the produce, the smell of the place as well as it’s lame rules and layout and just the all-around craptasitc nature of socialism in practice.

Simon practiced free market capitalism and decided to ditch the place for a store that sold the items he wanted but didn’t give him the hassle.

If you are one of those naïve people (younger than 25) who think communism is a good idea in principle, you need to spend 30 minutes in the food Coop. See how petty, bitter and mean people become when they are working for the collective. Everyone is paranoid that everyone else is shirking on their responsibilities, not working hard enough or disobeying a rule they themselves obey. I’ve been told off more times than I can count for such minor offences as leaving the queue for a moment to grab something I forgot, having 16 items in my basket instead of 15 when on line in the express queue, reaching over somebody’s head, not having my membership card out and ready the second it was requested and on and on… By the time you are done in there you want to shatter glass with a hysterical screaming fit.

Working there was even worse; you’d always get one hideous person on your shift. Someone whose every word would bring you closer to a spasm of homicidal/suicidal rage. They’d always be into Italian hip-hop, Maori chanting, crocheting or some other random absurdity that affirmed their status as the dullard of the universe. Either that or they’d be a busybody, a person in love with the coop. The equivalent to an informer in communist Russia, the kind of person who would have you killed with a sly word in the right ear.

If it wasn’t for the San Francisco metro area, I would have to say that Seattle had the highest food co-op/membership privileges produce market saturations per capita.

In fact, that is the reason the Analog Wife does the vast majority of the shopping in our house: I can’t put up with the bullshit. She joins these places like it’s an addiction. If I go to the co-op down the road (and there is a co-op down the road from just about everyplace I’ve every lived in this town), I end up making plans to nuke the place before I get halfway done. If I go to the produce place I get scowls because they can somehow tell that ‘I’m not one of them’, probably because I almost always look like I’m going to work and we know about hippies and work (or maybe it is the leather logger boots). If I go to the regular supermarket, I have to deal with some creepy asshat either outside the store protesting the business’ “Capitalistic Destructionâ€? or in the aisles loudly talking about said ‘Destruction’ while shopping for one very inexpensive item (that way, they’re not protesting and the store can’t kick them out, you see).

If you really want to see something funny though, check out how the co-opers go after each other in this post found linked in the comments at Simon’s.

And one point about the constant waiting in lines at co-ops: a goodly number of these folks are buying their organic food to be ‘healtier’. I bet that it would just kill them to know that they wasted most of those extra hours/days/years they got from ‘eating healthy’ standing in line to buy food at the co-op.

Posted in The Left is Never Right | Comments Off on Market Forces

RNS Quote of the Day

If a man believes that ‘The Common Good’ is intrinsic in certain actions, he will not hesitate to force others to perform them. If he believes that the human benefit of injury caused by such actions is of no significance, he will regard the sea of blood as of no significance. If he believes that the beneficiaries of such actions are irrelevant or interchangeable, he will regard wholesale slaughter as his moral duty in the service of a higher good.

Ayn Rand: What is Captialism – 1965

Posted in Quote of the Day | Comments Off on RNS Quote of the Day

The Trial of Saddam

Even if its editorial policies did a 180, the New York Times would have a hard time erasing its image as a left-wing mouthpiece with bureau chiefs who look like this:


That’s John Burns, Baghdad Bureau Chief for the Times, who gave a really interesting report on Saddam’s trial today for the Newshour on PBS. The transcript won’t be available ’til tomorrow, but here’s the RealAudio.

The key point of interest to me was the effect this trial seems to be having upon Iraqis: Burns noted (I’m paraphrasing) that even Sunni Arabs, the primary benefactors of Saddam’s rule, found the testimony about the brutality of Saddam’s regime shocking and disturbing — even those who had previously looked upon the dictator as a hero and told Burns that they wanted Saddam freed.

This is exactly the effect that you’d expect when Iraqis are exposed to accounts of heinous crimes that the rest of the world has known about for years, but it’s good to see nonetheless.
Continue reading →

Posted in Order of the imperial upraised middle finger. | Comments Off on The Trial of Saddam

The Common Good

Starting last Friday, the topic of the ‘RNS Quote of the Day’ has focused in the flawed concept of “The Common Good�. I’m hoping to be able to continue this for the rest of the week because the concept deserves as much derision as one can heap upon it.

Yesterday, I swung by the new ‘Pajamas Media’ for a looksee and found a discussion group that they are calling a ‘BlogJam’. Neat concept; kind of like a comments section but the participants are invited into it and it has to stay on topic.

The participants for this one are Michael Barone of US News & World Report, Perry De Havilland of Samizdata, Franklin Cudjoe of Imani Ghana, Peng Hwa Ang of the UN’s Working Group on Internet Governance and Dan Gillmor.

Today’s topic is titled “Whose internet is it anyway?�, discussing the UN’s want of control over this here internet.

If you get some time, you might want to go take a look, though I will warn you that a couple of the participants will make reading the thing a bit frustrating just by what they say.

Oddly enough, or maybe not so oddly, one of the strongest proponents of the internet staying just the way it is Franklin Cudjoe from Ghana, and has seen first hand what happens when you let a government entity touch personal access to it.

The reason I bring this up and the ‘Quotes of the Day’ together is that the folks who want the UN or some similar entity to take over administering the internet are using ‘The Common Good’ as their basis of reasoning.

Always, always, always keep those folks as far away as possible from anything you care about.

But you already knew that. Go read.

Posted in Useful Idiots | 1 Comment

RNS Quote of the Day

Every social system is based, explicitly or implicitly, on some theory of ethics. The tribal notion of ‘The Common Good’ has served as the moral justification of most social systems – and all of the tyrannies – in history. The degree of a society’s enslavement or freedom correspond to the degree to which that tribal slogan was invoked or ignored.

Ayn Rand: What is Capitalism – 1965

Posted in Quote of the Day | Comments Off on RNS Quote of the Day

If one standard is good

Two must be even better, right?

Last week I posted about how half of the ‘Member Nations’ at the UN either refused to vote in favor of or just plain refused to vote on a resolution “Expressing Serious Concern� about the human rights abuses in North Korea.

The next to last sentence in the linked article said the following,

“Many objected to the General Assembly targeting individual countries with resolutions about human rights violations.�

Well, they sure must have all gotten over their objections pretty darn quickly because last Thursday the UN member nations voted nearly unanimously to pass six resolutions on the exact same topic targeting Israel, just like the organization has done for the past couple decades.

Unfortunately, all John Bolton could do was hold a press conference to state the obvious,

“These resolutions are purely symbolic,� Bolton told reporters at the UN. “It is one reason why many people say the UN is not really useful in solving actual problems. We have been making enormous progress toward solutions in the Arab-Israeli conflict, and that progress has benefited from UN participation, but it does not benefit from needless repetition of meaningless resolutions in the General Assembly.�

(link found at LGF)

And now I shall repeat my opinion from last week,

“I contend that if hell itself opened up, swallowed the UN building whole and then closed up again, we could actually call that a plus since Manhattan would have space for a brand spanking new parking garage.�

Posted in Too Stupid to Live | Comments Off on If one standard is good

Projection

Since liberals rarely say what they mean, and when they do, they immediately spin it so that they can deny what they said, when the Iranian ‘president’ Ahmedinejad speaks on his wish to eliminate Israel, they immediately think that he must just be talking facetiously.

From the comments section of the BBC’s website,

“Iran’s Prime minister said ‘Israel should be wiped off the map’. How do we know that he wasn’t referring to a peaceful arrangement for Israel to give land back to Palestine rather than a violent threat?”

sarcasm set to stun/ Yeah buddy, that must be it exactly! /sarcasm off

Found at SteynOnline via the FreeWillBlog and the Kallini Brothers.

Posted in Useful Idiots | Comments Off on Projection

This is not Autoblogging

You see, the first time I tried Autoblogging, the video card in my laptop went T.U. The second time I tried it, our server crashed. That was back in Jan of 2004, when Nukevet Neal and our host at the time had some disagreements about how much of a priority it was to get the site up and running again and we had to get a new domain name when negotiations went down the tubes. BTW, if anyone wants to know the name of a hosting company to never, ever work with, my email addy is in the right hand column.

So now that we have it straight that this is not Autoblogging, lets take a look at a car or two, shall we?
Continue reading →

Posted in Kewel! | 3 Comments

RNS Quote of the Day

“The Common Good� is a meaningless concept, unless taken literally, in which case it’s only possible meaning is: the sum of the good of all the individual men involved. But in that case, the concept is meaningless as a moral criterion: it leaves open the question of what is the good of individual men and how does one determine it?

It is not, however, in its literal meaning that that concept is generally used. It is accepted precisely for its elastic, un-definable, mystical character which serves, not as a moral guide, but as an escape from morality. Since the good is not applicable to the disembodied, it becomes a moral blank check for those who attempt to embody it.

Ayn Rand: What is Capitalism – 1965

Posted in Quote of the Day | Comments Off on RNS Quote of the Day