Because it’ll be a cold day in hell before you find at the library.
The Heller Case: Gun Rights Affirmed
Because it’ll be a cold day in hell before you find at the library.
The Heller Case: Gun Rights Affirmed
That was Townhall.Com yesterday.
You can start out with this post from Amanda Carpenter, who has some questions for McCain about his mortgage buyout idea. My favorite of the bunch:
There’s no evidence the housing market has bottomed out yet. What if housing prices drop another 15 or 20 percent after their mortgages are renegotiated and the homeowners are under water again?
Very good question. If the government does it once, why shouldn’t people expect them to do it again?
And after you are dont with that one, you can take in this post by Walter E. Williams
In my more cynical moments, I think that we Americans deserve what we get from our politicians, many of whom can be generally described as nothing less than loathsome. You say, “Williams, that’s a pretty heavy putdown.” My question to you is how else would you describe these congressmen who are now blaming the financial mess on the failure of the free market?
That market was about as free as a tiger in a zoo.
Which is an apt description in more ways that one, when you really think about it.
Now, I only have my Pocket Constitution handy, and maybe they left one out so to make it fit the pocket-sized format, but I don’t really think so.
Last night, the Presidential candidate for the Democratic Party stated that he believes that health care is a right. Flat out. Point blank. No BS from BO.
So I’m going through the Bill of Rights and I’m looking for any other Right that requires me to give money to the government so that the government can spend it for me to fulfill said “Right”.
1st Amendment – The government will not provide me with a radio or television station, or even a sturdy crate made of wood or plastic to scream off of, or even an internet connection to blog via. Nor will they build me a church to worship in. None of my tax dollars are spent to provide me with what is needed to use this right.
2nd Amendment – The government will not buy me a gun so that I can use this right. Thankfully, because instead of the M14’s that I’d enjoy having (and that Clinton had hacked to scrap), they’d probably issue me a very well used M9. None of my tax dollars are spent to provide me with what is needed to use this right.
3rd, and 4th Amendments – No and no. Both of these expressly tell the government to NOT spend money screwing me over. None of my tax dollars are spent to provide me with what is needed to use this right.
9th and 10th Amendments – Again, no and no. Both of these are free of charge to any and all. They simply and clearly state that the federal government cannot say that the first eight amendments to the Constitution are the ONLY rights given to the people and the states. None of my tax dollars are spent to provide me with what is needed to use this right.
5th, 6th, 7th and 8th Amendments – I previously skipped over these for a reason. There is a good deal of tax money spent providing me with a forum where I can pursue these rights.
However, the people employed at these forums are employees of the government, with those in positions of decision making either elected by the people or are appointed by those elected by the people. I know I shouldn’t give guys like Obama any ideas, but I do not see anywhere in his plan where he will buy the hospitals and clinics and make the doctors, nurses and other staff all employees in a new bureaucracy of grand scale.
For thousands of years, doctors have plied their trade as individuals and as small groups. Conversely, it is historically only government, whether it be one selected by the governed or self-appointed, who has issued law.
It is only a 20th Century construct to bring medicine into the realm of government as a birthright. This idea has been shown to be an epic, almost murderous, failure wherever it is tried and no one has yet to explain exactly how or why, within reason, it should be placed in the hands of government and not left alone.
This includes the Democrat Party’s Presidential candidate. He simply says it is what HE says it is and then goes on to explain that he needs my money to make this farce happen.
If he cannot lay it down in simple terms that even a prole like me can understand, why should anyone believe him?
I agree with UCLA Staff Members.
Two UCLA economists say they have figured out why the Great Depression dragged on for almost 15 years, and they blame a suspect previously thought to be beyond reproach: President Franklin D. Roosevelt.
After scrutinizing Roosevelt’s record for four years, Harold L. Cole and Lee E. Ohanian conclude in a new study that New Deal policies signed into law 71 years ago thwarted economic recovery for seven long years.
“Why the Great Depression lasted so long has always been a great mystery, and because we never really knew the reason, we have always worried whether we would have another 10- to 15-year economic slump,” said Ohanian, vice chair of UCLA’s Department of Economics. “We found that a relapse isn’t likely unless lawmakers gum up a recovery with ill-conceived stimulus policies.”
In an article in the August issue of the Journal of Political Economy, Ohanian and Cole blame specific anti-competition and pro-labor measures that Roosevelt promoted and signed into law June 16, 1933.
“President Roosevelt believed that excessive competition was responsible for the Depression by reducing prices and wages, and by extension reducing employment and demand for goods and services,” said Cole, also a UCLA professor of economics. “So he came up with a recovery package that would be unimaginable today, allowing businesses in every industry to collude without the threat of antitrust prosecution and workers to demand salaries about 25 percent above where they ought to have been, given market forces. The economy was poised for a beautiful recovery, but that recovery was stalled by these misguided policies.”
OK, I was being facetious with the title. But that isn’t going to stop me from keeping this link for-evar.
There is much more at the link.
I wonder exactly what kind of math Barack Obama was taught in the foreign schools he attended as a child
Tonight, Senator Obama said $18 billion in earmarks between 535 Congressional ne’er-do-wells isn’t that big a deal, but if we can only keep 500 CEOs from getting $350 million in tax breaks, well, that’s how we fix problems!
Charles Austin – Instapundit reader
In the math of my world, $18,000,000,000 dollars is mathematically 51 times larger $350,000,000.
And it shows exactly what kind of moral character Obama has that he sees spending that large an amount of taxpayer dollars as not a big deal, but that cutting someone a break on their taxes because they can be classified as “The Rich” is an atrocity.
If he had a functioning brain that could think analytically instead of a dogma that demands class warfare, he would see that not spending the money in the first place would be the better solution.
And if we had a media that was similarly equipped with such minds, they might be calling bullshit on the guy.
…including a link to this very important note about the auction of Lehman Credit-Default Swaps tomorrow. It has huge implications for whether or not the credit crisis is manageable or is going to spiral out of control, fast. Go read.
Here’s Rawles’ predictions for the next decade. I don’t know that it’s gonna be as bad as he thinks, but he’s been very right so far….
Every few years, local employment magnate Boeing, goes through a strike.
Sometimes they are short lived.
Sometimes they go on for months.
The current one is looking like the latter of those two choices. This headline and story is from July.
Boeing Machinists 99% in favor of strike
Thousands of Boeing Machinists who assemble the company’s jetliners filled the former home of the Seattle Sonics on Wednesday to authorize their union to strike if a new labor contract can’t be reached.
They are demanding a much bigger share of The Boeing Co.’s success of the past three years — and they are prepared to walk in September and shut down Boeing’s jetliner production if they don’t get it.
“It’s payback time,” one union leader, Mark Blondin, said to thunderous applause. He was president of Local 751 of the International Association of Machinists during contact talks in 2005 and 2002 and is now the national union’s aerospace coordinator.
All the best sources are saying that attitudes haven’t changed a bit since then.
The funniest part of that article is the title. The majority of the Boeing employees who call themselves a “Machinist” couldn’t find the ON switch on a mill or lathe in under 30 seconds. The same standard goes for someone who works at Boeing as an “Electrician”.
Most Boeing employees are just like GM employees: Over paid and Under worked. And there are generational lines, sometimes three and four long, treating the company for granted.
The locals don’t call it “The Lazy B Ranch” for nothing.
Certainly, there are some folks who do some sort of actual work for Boeing, since they do churn out actual product. But if it weren’t for the UAW styled union always demanding more pay for less work, Boeing could easily cut 10% off their employment rolls and not see a negative tick in production.
There are even not-so-family friendly names for when Boeing goes on strike. And us non-Boeing employees love these times. Cars, boats, jetskis, quads, and especially firearms, bought by Boeing employees during their high times, go on the sales block, and at fire sale prices.
I’ll be wishing I had a couple grand extra saved up here in the next couple weeks since these cat’s bennies are drying up and the union is telling them to file for unemployment.
And what, are the employees asking for, you may ask?
Everything. More pay, better contributions to the pension, cheaper medical. And you can add no more outsourcing and a promise not to pull a Toyota/BMW/Nissan/Honda and move production to where it is cheaper, like, say, the Southeastern part of the country.
Are they going to get it?
My Magic 8-Ball is telling me no.
Boeing CEO in no hurry to settle strike
Boeing chairman and chief executive Jim McNerney sent a memo to employees Monday that was also a firm message to the Machinists union: Though the ongoing strike is now into its fifth week and all commercial jet production is halted, Boeing won’t scramble to settle on the union’s terms.
McNerney warned that the International Association of Machinists’ (IAM) “track record of repeated union work stoppages” is “earning us a reputation as an unreliable supplier to our customers.”
….
“It would be gravely unwise for Boeing to agree to terms in any contract that would fundamentally restrict our ability to manage our business,” McNerney wrote. “U.S. auto companies, for one, all but fatally wounded themselves years ago by promising unsustainable wage and benefit levels and by agreeing to contract conditions (including job guarantees) that limited their flexibility to run their businesses in the face of intense global competition. Today, their market shares continue to fall, and their layoffs have grown by the thousands.”
“We want this strike to end,” said McNerney. “But we cannot sacrifice our long-term competitiveness for expedience in a short-term agreement to end the walkout.”
In the midst of all the other financial ups and downs America is currently going through, these folks are going to play chicken with an international corporation. I may not even need a couple thousand saved in reserve to be buying their second hand stuff. They’ll be feeling lucky to get a case of dog food by January.
They need to take their raise and get down to actually working for a living. Just being somewhere for eight hours shouldn’t guarantee you a paycheck.
Or at least ONE of the problems with government is that it is always seeking to expand itself.
Take budgets for example: If you use all of your previous years funds (aka: Your Monetary Quota), even if it is a last day of the fiscal calendar purchase of a pallet of ball point pens, then you are seen as “successful” and are granted a slightly larger amount of money to spend the next year.
But if you go over budget, you are seen as “not as successful” and are punished by having a great quantity of funding shoved your way to make sure that it doesn’t happen the following year.
If you want your department and management to be graded as “Poor”, do what Darpa did: Hold your contractors accountable for their work and save the taxpayer $130 Million.
Congress just cut $130 million from Darpa’s budget for next year, citing “poor execution” of previous funded projects. Some in charge of the purse strings say the Pentagon’s premiere research agency wasn’t spending the cash it was given.
….
Earlier in the week, House and Senate negotiators agreed to a defense budget for the upcoming fiscal year, which begins on October 1st. As usual, they agreed to the vast majority of spending proposed by the Defense Department. And the programs they tweaked, cut or increase funding for were altered without much comment. For the most part.
But in the case of Darpa — the Defense Department’s cutting-edge science and technology division — Congress proclaimed “poor execution” a half-dozen times, as it trimmed more than $130 million from Darpa’s approximately $3 billion budget.
The Democrat run Congress will point to this and say they’ve cut the Defense Budget.
McCain needs to point out why Darpa didn’t meet their budget “quota”.
I’m going to have to hunt this one down
The history of the yeast literally dates back before the dawn of man, to a time when the earth was warm, tropical and teeming with life. Modern mammals that we see today were beginning to appear in what is known as the Eocene epoch (from the Greek word eos meaning “dawnâ€). During this time, a snapshot of biological life was trapped by tropical tree sap. Over the course of millions of years, the sap hardened into amber, which preserved and protected its contents. That is, until Dr. Cano, using amber obtained from locations around the world (including Burma, Central and North America), isolated and revived a bacterium, which had lain dormant in the gut of an encased bee for approximately 40 million years (Science 268, pp. 1060-1064, 1995). During his research, Dr. Cano, periodically working with Mr. Lambert, isolated a few yeast strains that resembled modern Saccharomyces cerevisiae. In other words, they are similar to the yeast we use every day for brewing and baking, except the newly discovered yeasts were much further back in the evolutionary chain. Essentially, Dr. Cano isolated the long lost ancestors of modern brewing yeast.
Go read the reviews.
If this relaxed, witty, animated McCain shows up for tomorrow night’s debate, Obama’s gonna feel like he walked into a windmill. Watch for the wink at 50 seconds in.