Not happy with the King County Democrats recent proposition to make rural land owners in the county refugees on their own property by making it so that they can only use 35% of their own land, Senator Patty Murray (D-Dimwit) has once again proposed taking part of a National Forest and making it a �Wilderness Area�.
She has tried this at least two times before, and has even named the area �Wild Sky�. But both times, she was turned down because her proposed land grab included areas that contained pre-existing roads. She has gotten approval in the Senate for this, but she doubts she�ll be able to get it through the house.
Former Washington State Representative, George Nethercutt (R), who lost his bid to replace Murray in the last election, proposed a nearly identical idea last year in the house, minus the areas with pre-existing roads, but was slapped down by two other Washington Representatives Jay Inslee (D-Numbnuts) and Rick Larsen (D-Asshat).
Personally, I can�t remember the differences between a National Forest and a �Wilderness Area�. I think that roads are able to be built in a National Forest, but not in a Wilderness Area and there may also be some extra logging contraints. Maybe someone out there can remind me.
Either way, I sense ulterior motives here, possibly along the lines of wanting to be making the enviro-wackos happy.
Because they believe that land is better served when it is in the hands of the government, than in the hands of private citizens.
