Brendolina is back with a whole new flood of vitirol against you know who.
After enduring another of her conspiracy laden emails, stemming from Monday’s post, I warned her that
BTW, any further emails to me will be, from this point on, available for my use at my site
I figured that since she probably wouldn’t want anyone and everyone to see her acting as stupid as she does privately, and letting her know that any correspondence I received from her would be considered by me as agreed upon permittible for posting here, she would shut the hell up and leave me alone.
I was wrong.
She waited a day to run it through her thought synapses, if she does actually have thought synapses, and then fired off yet another email that repeated the same theme as her comment over last weekend.
(1) Â You don’t have the courage to register your little hate blog under your
own name, hiding behind the name of another man.
(2) You provided false information to your ISP when you renewed your
registration.
(3) You know that both your ISP and InterNIC has incorrect information.
(4) Â You are knowingly chosen to continue in this fraud by refusing to
correct (1)-(3).
She has gotten it down four points from the previous eight. I’m thinking this must be the Cliff Notes version. She goes on to threaten our good man RD with ‘Defaming her’ by his suggesting that I file stalker charges against her.
You might ask your 25-year-old police officer if threatening to file
criminal charges against someone is defamatory. Â Assuming that he exists,
you will find that it is. Â Now, I’m not you (thank the Good Lord), but if I
were, I would carefully consider your threat to post any information about
me in any public forum.
Of course, she doesn’t consider threatening to report me to the internet police, publically, on my own website, as ‘Defamitory’. Or maybe she forgot about that? I’m also certain that she does not have even middle school level reading comprehension skills. Otherwise, she would have ascertained that our good man RD is a 25yr VETERAN police officer, not a “25-year-old police officer”.
But hey, she probably is a product of the Seattle Public School system.
Her next paragraph is an attempt to frighten me into not publishing this email.
You might also carefully consider the copyright violation that will occur if
you publish or otherwise use any of my writing without my express written
permission. Â You have not received it.Â
Unfortunately for her, when I warned her that I would publish her this email if she ever sent it, her reply was, in effect, an agreement from her that it was alright to do so. She knew that it would be published before she even started typing.
And yet she did so.
After that bit, it was just random insults which didn’t even have the well though out analogical processes that a Klueless Kos Kid has. Which is strange, since you’d figure that because she is using one of the Kos Kids’ favorite tactics, she’d also have read about how to make an insulting analogy.
And on it goes. My reply to her is below the fold. Yes, it is a bit long winded, but I wanted to make sure I had everything in there. Please make a special note of the last paragraph. It was bolded in the email as well, to make sure that she saw it.
I found something at Captain’s Quarters this morning (I took most of yesterday off from the internet) that I’m pretty sure Brendolina has never read, and will much less will ever sign, The Online Integrity Statement of Principles, which came out just this Tuesday. How timely.
We’ll just post the first statement.
#1. Private persons are entitled to respect for their privacy regardless of their activities online. This includes respect for the non-public nature of their personal contact information, the inviolability of their homes, and the safety of their families. No information which might lead others to invade these spaces should be posted. The separateness of private persons’ professional lives should also be respected as much as is reasonable.
But then again, I’ve never said Brendolina was reasonable. She is, as all saw by her comments over last weekend, a leftist who believes that if her ideas are challenged, she needs to threaten said challenger until that person lets her win an argument.
Continue reading →