One Missouri state representative has discovered a use for the proposed statewide AWB
Target Practice!
One Missouri state representative has discovered a use for the proposed statewide AWB
Target Practice!
That has little to no chance of passing out of committee
A liberal state senator from Shoreline is pushing schools and preschools to teach kids about gun safety using a curriculum developed by the National Rifle Association.
Sen. Maralyn Chase, a Democrat, said she is very fond of the NRA’s Eddie Eagle GunSafe Program, which she said has used to teach her own grandson about gun safety. The program includes the mantra, “Stop! Don’t touch. Leave the area. Tell an adult.â€
“If a child finds a gun, they think, oh, it’s a toy, and they can pick it up,†Chase said Thursday. “We need to include gun safety in all the other safety things we teach our children. If you get on fire, drop and roll. Don’t take candy from a stranger, don’t get in cars from strangers, don’t pick up a gun.â€
Chase, who received a D ranking from the NRA for her stance on gun control issues in 2010, is sponsoring two bills that would promote use of the Eddie Eagle program in Washington schools. Senate Bill 5660 would require the Office of the Superintendent of Public Instruction (OSPI) to create a gun safety program using Eddie Eagle teachings, which schools could then adopt during the 2014-15 school year.
Meanwhile, Senate Joint Resolution 8006 asks the Legislature to urge all schools, preschools, daycare programs and licensed child care providers to use the Eddie Eagle program to teach firearms safety.
While Chase’s views don’t always jibe with those of the NRA, she said the organization’s Eddie Eagle program has nothing to do with gun rights, only common-sense gun safety.
It is nice to at least see them try.
Many employers are those who have learned — the hard way — to comply with the whims of the regulators, no matter how inconstant, vacuous or corrupt they may be. Be a good serf, and you’ll be allowed to continue existing.
As I grind my teeth at this, I find some solace in Kipling’s revised doxology:
Ere they hewed the Sphinx’s visage
Favouritism governed kissage,
Even as it does in this age.Who shall doubt “the secret hid
Under Cheops’ pyramid”
Was that the contractor did
Cheops out of several millions?
Or that Joseph’s sudden rise
To Comptroller of Supplies
Was a fraud of monstrous size
On King Pharaoh’s swart Civilians?Thus, the artless songs I sing
Do not deal with anything
New or never said before.
As it was in the beginning
Is to-day official sinning,
And shall be for evermore!— Rudyard Kipling, A General Summary
I can flatly state that every single regular visitor is suffering from a mental illness called Drapetomania.
Drapetomania is suffered by those who have an aversion to being slaves.
In the early 1850’s an American Physician coined this term to describe the mental state of runaway slaves and those who attempted to run away. Is was and still is a prime example of pseudopsycology, but start claiming to your friends and loved ones that you believe you might need therapy for your Drapetomania affliction and watch them become concerned.
Hell, it sounds so “official” you could probably get a day or two off from work to go to therapy.
By the way, “therapy” consists of hours and hours of range time. I doubt your healthcare insurance will cover it, but with ammo costs these days, it may be worth a try.
Especially since the universities are taking people like Sarah O. Conly quite seriously:
Against Autonomy: Justifying Coercive Paternalism
Against Autonomy is a defense of paternalistic laws; that is, laws that make you do things, or prevent you from doing things, for your own good. I argue that autonomy, or the freedom to act in accordance with your own decisions, is overrated—that the common high evaluation of the importance of autonomy is based on a belief that we are much more rational than we actually are. We now have lots of evidence from psychology and behavioral economics that we are often very bad at choosing effective means to our ends. In such cases, we need the help of others—and in particular, of government regulation—to keep us from going wrong.
My decisions are overrated because they differ from hers.
I’m going to need lots of therapy to recover from that paragraph.
When Washington State and Oregon first ventured into nuclear power in the 70’s, they named their agencies rather similarly.
Washington had the Washington Public Power Supply System and Oregon had the Oregon Public Power Supply System. For the sharper knives in the audience, you may have already noticed that their acronyms were WPPSS and OPPSS. Regionally, we called them Whoops and Ooops.
Thankfully, we never actually any problems or leaks at the actual power plants. The Hanford Nuclear Reservation is another story altogether.
Last week when it was pointed out that the opponents of firearms civil rights planned to pass a bill which included home inspections, the trifecta who sponsored the bill issued statements that basically said “Whoops! How’d that get in there?”
Tis a pity that the same provisions for home inspection have appeared in similar legislation in Oregon. I says this because if those guys issue statements saying “Ooops!”, I’m going to be rolling on the floor.
But using your money, and not Monopoly money.
The Georgia Sheriff’s Association is whinging about a bill in their state house that, supposedly, would cut back on how much money and property their members can confiscate and turn into revenue.
The bill does not fix any of the main problems with asset forfeiture in Georgia: the government can take property without convicting anyone of a crime, law enforcement can keep what it seizes, and reporting requirements are vague and frequently ignored.
The bill does increase the government’s burden of proof (from preponderance of the evidence to clear and convincing). But that only helps property owners once their case reaches court—most don’t. Often the forfeited property is worth less than the cost of a lawyer.
One Sheriff is even saying that simply giving a Commissioner the power to decide how the money is used will “demoralize” his deputies to the point where they may stop enforcing the law at all.
It is like they’re issued Certified Asshole certificates when they those damn sunglasses.
Found via Reason
They will be fast moving and probably have superior jumping abilities.
“Zombie†mammalian cells that may function better after they die have been created by researchers at Sandia National Laboratories and the University of New Mexico (UNM).
The simple technique coats a cell with a silica solution to form a near-perfect replica of its structure. The process may simplify a wide variety of commercial fabrication processes from the nano- to macroscale. It’s also allowing scientists to preserve cells down to the minor grooves of its DNA.
So now there is only one question left: Will headshots still work?
I would like to ask the readers and contributors here at RNS for some help.
Some back story: I’ve been married for almost two years now. Two teenage step-kids and a baby. We’re planning another baby eventually. About nine months ago, I started a new job in a field I plan to make my career. The job doubled my salary overnight; I love it, I like more than ninety percent of the people in my immediate work unit. Life is great.
Now that I am making decent money I have been able to set some aside for long-delayed projects. Things like Glamdring, who languished for seven years waiting to be whole. I have a lot of projects waiting in the wings; more than I can tackle at once and certainly more than I have money to pay for all at once, even with my shiny new paychecks. My mother told me when I was in middle school, “Successful people make lists.” Well, I don’t know if all of them do, but once I started keeping lists I at least didn’t forget things as often. And I have quite a few lists, probably none of them particularly exciting or unusual for most of our readers. Among them, inevitably, is my “Firearms List.” It’s fairly long and involved, I’ve spent quite a bit of thought on it. Finally seeing some progress on that list has been nice.
Wolf’s “cane gun” post of the other day triggered this post. My current project involves reconfiguring my childhood hunting shotgun, a 20-gauge Remington 870 Wingmaster given to me when I was ten years old. I want to be able to convert it from a hunting weapon to a home-defense shotgun that my wife or daughter could use at need. They are both small women: the standard length of pull is far too great, and the 28″ full-choke barrel, while it has bagged me many a bird on the wing, makes the gun unwieldy indoors, and adds to the girls’ difficulty in handling it. The project has hit some snags, but it proceeds. I’ll be sure to provide pictures and so forth once it’s complete. I was updating my firearms list last week regarding this project while my wife was reading over my shoulder. She expressed concern about my overall firearms list: “Are you preparing for World War III?”
I doubt any self-respecting “prepper” would consider my current state of readiness for most scenarios anywhere near up to snuff (subject of another list), so no I can’t claim to be preparing for WWIII. Her immediate worry was that if I spend too much money on “gun stuff” that our home improvement projects will suffer. I tried to explain the utility of a more compact shotgun for defense, but it became clear that we were talking past each other. In my wife’s view, I have a .45 caliber bedside gun; home defense is thus achieved. Anything else is just fun toys for me to mess with. I don’t see it that way, but my arguments clearly didn’t convince her.
So I ask you folks: how do I explain my concerns and make my points without winding up on the couch? My wife is not anti-gun; far from it. She is, however, relatively new to guns and not extremely experienced in their use or the sorts of mindsets that go with them. We are going to be getting training together, (it’s on a list) but I feel that I could stand to have more ammunition, so to speak, when we discuss these sorts of things in the future.
Fire away! And thanks in advance.
SAF gets an enormous win at the appellate level when the full 7th Circuit let Posner’s ruling stand today.
Will Chicago appeal to the Supremes? Maybe, but in the meantime the clock is indeed ticking for the Illinois state legislature to enact a concealed carry licensing scheme against their will.
Oh, that felt so good to write.
Fender bass, Boss ME-25 effects pedal, an amp, and mad skillz.