Shipstones?

In Friday, Heinlein postulates a megacorporation based on a power source — in this case a “Shipstone” (named after the inventor) that’s capable of powering houses indefinitely. Everyone wants one, of course, and since the corporation won’t divulge the thing’s secrets and it’s apparently impossible to reverse-engineer, the company has monopoly power and gets incredibly big selling them to everyone on the planet at whatever price the market will bear.

Well, it’s not the same thing as a Shipstone exactly, but if I had a pile of money sitting around, I’d buy one of these in a heartbeat:

batteryx.jpg

A new type of a room-size battery … may be poised to store energy for the nation’s vast electric grid almost as easily as a reservoir stockpiles water, transforming the way power is delivered to homes and businesses. Compared with other utility-scale batteries plagued by limited life spans or unwieldy bulk, the sodium-sulfur battery is compact, long-lasting and efficient.

Guess I’ll have to make do with lesser fare for now. Hurry up market, drop those prices!

This entry was posted in By Ourselves, For Ourselves, Kewel!. Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to Shipstones?

  1. emdfl says:

    Unless I am mistaken, the big problem with NaS batteries is that their operating temperature is fairly high – as in >200*F.

  2. Another drawback I can see is that any building with one of these inside becomes an instant hazmat site in the event of a fire or other major-damage causing disaster (earthquake, tornado, etc)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.