Not surprising that they’d take this tone

NY Times columnist basically calls the Tea Partiers Terrorrists

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

18-and-a-half-minutes

You know it’s time to call it a night when you find yourself trying to think of the punchline for a a dirty joke about reticle range estimation and Rose Mary Woods.

Sorry.

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

Lock down yer gunz!

In my hands, moments ago, was a Mossberg Maverick 88.

It is owned by the woman who does all the inkwork on The Wife and I. It was stolen out of her closet two years ago and returned to her two weeks ago. The police took it off a 20-something small-time criminal. It is beat up, rusted on the barrel and mag tube, has deep scratches up and down both sides and the top of the receiver and gouges in the stock and front pump grip.

Since it is a shotgun, they thankfully can’t trace it to any particular crime. Luckily for her.

I’m going to try and get it looking a bit more respectable, if I can. If I can’t I’ll get quotes for refinishing and see where she wants to go from there. Right now she’s thinking of having it powdercoated pink. “What criminal would want a pink gun?” she said.

On a similar note….

I was informed by one of my co-workers last night that his son had his 1911 stolen out of his car last weekend while he and his girlfriend were in a bar. Luckily for him, the police recovered it off a known felon Monday night and returned it to him on Tuesday.

I don’t care if it’s a $50 lockbox you bought at the local hardware store. Lock down your guns. Tell everyone you know to do so too.

Annoyed at “report your stolen firearms within 24 hours or you’re going to jail” laws getting proposed/enacted? Lock down your guns. Tell everyone you know to do so too.

Pissed off at “safe storage” mandates being proposed/enacted? Lock down your guns. Tell everyone you know to do so too.

If we can lower the number of firearms being stolen and entering the black market, these proposals will begin to go away.

Stupid Storage = Stolen firearms.

Posted in Have Gun, Will Travel | 5 Comments

Ready, Set, GO!

The race begins for Kahr P380s, now legal in California. At SHOT I was jazzed to learn from a helpful Kahr booth-person that the P380 would be officially added to the California handgun roster in June 2010. But it just got added to the roster THREE DAYS AGO.

KahrPM9193-LCI-2.jpg

Here’s the problem: what the Kahr person meant to say was that a Kahr P380 with the identical model number, but with the California-required magazine disconnect and loaded-chamber-indicator “features,” would begin shipping in June 2010.

At left is a pic of the Kahr PM9 with the LCI clearly visible on the top of the slide behind the chamber port; apparently they managed to squeeze that into the 380, no mean feat.

Where that leaves those of us who want a Kahr P380 NOW is running around the state trying to find a dealer with a “featureless” Kahr P380 in stock who’s willing to sell it to us. C’mon, buddy, it’s legal, it’s on the list….

Posted in Have Gun, Will Travel | Leave a comment

Once again

Bad guy kills good person by walking right through a restraining order.

Posted in Uncategorized | 4 Comments

Them enlightened Europeans

I have a friend living in the Netherlands, who saw this commercial and was just flabbergasted.  Don’t worry, just because it is in Dutch doesn’t mean you won’t get the meaning, they are pretty blatant.

Now, who thinks that if the leaders of the NAACP saw this, their heads would explode?

PS By no means should you send this to Jessie Jackson, Al Sharpton, or the leaders of the NAACP in an attempt to cause them to spontaneously explode.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Kids say the darndest things

This morning on the radio, I heard a mother talk about the following exchange between two 3rd grade girls:

Girl 1: When I grow up, I want to be a princess!
Girl2: When you’d better get over that right quick!

Also, Lt. Ronald over at Skippy’s Blog has an interesting son.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Environmental Reasoned Discourse

So I’m on Facebook when one of my very liberal Facebook Friends (i.e. a person I know only through Facebook) made a post regarding this story on NPR about how beliefs hinge on worldview.

Aside: Personally, I’m in the camp that the Earth is warming, but the case is highly overstated and the science community is suffering from a bad case of Confirmation Bias and Error Cascade coupled with a tendency to be very alarmist in order to get people to pay attention.  All of this wouldn’t bother me too much if there wasn’t a whole bevy of politicians chomping at the bit to use the threat of global warming to pass sweeping regulations, that just makes me all ornery and contentious.  :End Aside

The discussion so far in the comments of the post basically followed the whole, “Climate Skeptics are a bunch of ignorant rubes being lead around by a handful of smart shills for Big Oil.”, which I find annoying whenever anyone (right, left, or center) tries to distill a complex topic into such an idiotic blurb (and if you catch me doing it, feel free to call me on it).  So, in order to try and bring some understanding to the discussion, I attempted to demonstrate how a personal worldview colors risk assessment, and I used the threat of terrorism as an example.

See, it works like this: Most liberals will bemoan the use of the threat of terrorism to justify the encroaching power of the security/surveillance state and the erosion of our rights & freedoms.  They will argue that while the threat is real, it is inflated by the government (and certain parts of the media, cough!FoxNewscough!) and that the need to conduct warrantless searches and indefinite detentions is manufactured.  I posited that the same could be said about Global Warming, that the threat is inflated and the need for a sweeping regulatory environment is manufactured by the government, which is using the looming spectre of climate change.

The result was complaints about switching topics to discuss terrorism, and after I said that it’s not about terrorism, but rather about recognizing how everyone’s worldview colors their perceptions of risk, the entire post was flushed down the memory hole.

Le Sigh…

There are days that arguing on the internet is annoying.

Posted in Rampant Eco Socialism | 3 Comments

They made up the language

And they want us to pay for it.

It seems that our current administration thinks that unskilled labor needs to be paid above what they’re worth, under the guise of a “Living Wage”. Because we have so much extra cash lying around, don’t you know.

The White House is looking at a new policy that would give an advantage in bidding on government contracts to companies that offer generous benefits and good pay.

But business groups opposing the idea maintain it would shut out smaller businesses from competing for more than $500 billion a year in federal contracts and increase government procurement costs.

The policy is known as “high road” contracting and could draw the Obama administration into a larger debate over whether the government should use public purse strings to strengthen the middle class and promote higher labor standards.

Advocates of the plan include unions. They say too many jobs financed by government contracts come with low wages and limited benefits and support companies that violate employment laws.

When asked for evidence of that last claim, they promptly ended the press conference.

I might have made that last bit up. But only because the media never bothered to ask for evidence.

One thing I’ve noticed about the left is that whenever they describe a non-entity as “Living”, it means they want to kill it. The “Living” Constitution, is an example. They want to put so much “Life” into it that it’ll be dead soon thereafter.

In Illinois, at Northwestern University, students and faculty are demonstrating to demand a “Living Wage” for the campus’ unskilled laborers.

More than 320 students, faculty and community members gathered Wednesday afternoon to demonstrate for sub-contract workers’ rights at Northwestern University in Evanston, Ill.

According to the Daily Northwestern, the university pays nearly all of its sub-contract workers in food and janitorial services between $9 and $11 an hour. The living wage for Cook County, in which Northwestern sits, is $13.23.

I’ll make them a deal that will give them everything they’re demanding.

They all need to sign a petition stating their demand for this higher wage. Instead of the usual info needed on a petition form, I’ll just need their names and their Employee ID number or their Student ID number.

Then, once we figure out the total dollar amount of how much it’ll cost to increase the wages of the unskilled laborers, we’ll divide it up equally among the 320 or so people who showed up for the rally. Either taking it out of their paychecks or tacking it onto their tuition.

Sounds fair to me.

Little Billy and Suzie need to arrive at the realization that the money will have to come from somewhere. If they want to be that somewhere, then more power to them. But 99 times out of 100, they don’t. So fuck ’em.

Posted in Academia and Other Nonsense, Dare To Be Stupid | Leave a comment

Normally, this kind of talk stays between couples

With one asking it from the other.

But they need to start demanding it from their government. At least when it comes to health care.

Treat me like a dog

Found via Reason.TV

Posted in Life in the Atomic Age | Leave a comment