Federal Detroitism

It has been said that if President Obama had a country, it would look like Detroit.

Ahem

Amid the recent hubbub over municipal bankruptcies and rising public-employee pension costs, pay for state and local government employees has gotten a great deal of publicity. Lost in the press attention, however, is that federal-employee compensation remains a problem, too, and new data again indicate that Washington, D.C., may be overpaying for the two million workers it employs.

In a 2011 AEI paper with Jason Richwine, I concluded that federal workers receive salaries and benefits around 37 percent higher than do private-sector workers with similar levels of education and experience. This prompted congressional requests for the Congressional Budget Office to conduct its own analysis, which, the requesters hoped, would rebut ours. Using slightly different methods, the CBO showed a smaller wage premium for federal workers. They omitted a $2.3 billion per year federal subsidy to government workers’ accounts held by the Thrift Savings Plan, but still reached qualitatively similar conclusions: Federal workers receive pay and benefits 16 percent above private-sector levels.

You cannot incentivise working for the state in this way. Especially not at the lower levels. Government does not need “the best and the brightest” Clerk Typist II.

But when they’re dealing with your money and not their own, anything goes.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

One Response to Federal Detroitism

  1. Jason says:

    While I agree that most Fed employees are grossly overpaid, I would hesitate to use broad measures to correct the issue. I think a pointed inquiry into job categories and correction of wages would be most appropriate. I may be biased, being a federal employee myself, but my wages are nothing compared to my civilian counterparts. While I make $27 an hour (yes, just above average for the median income in my area), my civilian counterparts earn $100 an hour and up. So why do I do this instead? It’s part and parcel to my decision to serve in the Armed Forces. It allows me work in my MOS, supporting our troops ( which to me is more meaningful than the civilian sector equivilent).

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.