The only science they don’t believe

Is the science without bias.

Some 3,000 scientific robots that are plying the ocean have sent home a puzzling message. These diving instruments suggest that the oceans have not warmed up at all over the past four or five years. That could mean global warming has taken a breather. Or it could mean scientists aren’t quite understanding what their robots are telling them.

This is puzzling in part because here on the surface of the Earth, the years since 2003 have been some of the hottest on record. But Josh Willis at NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory says the oceans are what really matter when it comes to global warming.

In fact, 80 percent to 90 percent of global warming involves heating up ocean waters. They hold much more heat than the atmosphere can. So Willis has been studying the ocean with a fleet of robotic instruments called the Argo system. The buoys can dive 3,000 feet down and measure ocean temperature. Since the system was fully deployed in 2003, it has recorded no warming of the global oceans.

Now, you’ll remember this post wherein Mark Philip Alger tells us about the “weather tracking stations” and not just the flaws in their location and construction, but also the flaws in letting humans with possible (and quite probable) bias collect the information.

Now we have nearly five years of unquestionable data coming from over 3000 different machines placed around the planet, who are without bias, telling us that the main indicator of the Death Cult’s religion isn’t correlating with their theory, and both the Death Cult believers who read the machine’s data and the Kool-Aid drinking media calls it simply “Puzzling”.

I remember not wanting to believe there was no such person as Santa Claus, but my first response was not to call it “Puzzling”.

This entry was posted in The Global Warming Death Cult. Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to The only science they don’t believe

  1. Pingback: Idkal » Blog Archive » So, feel warmer yet?

  2. Now we have nearly five years of unquestionable data …

    Why do you believe the data is “unquestionable”?

  3. Phil says:

    Well, Burgess, exactly what kind of bias can a machine have? Especially 3000 different machines built and programmed by Death Cultists?

    Let me guess: You didn’t follow the link to Alger’s post? Why don’t you try that first, and then come back and try and have an honest discussion about some bias, mmm-kay?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.