Then check this Letter to the Editor from the Seattle Times out.
Support candidates who worked for everything they haven’t gotten
I see Democratic candidate for president Sen. Barack Obama, D-Ill., raised $23.5 million without using PACs or big donors; 100,000 donors — wow. [“Obama gives Clinton a run for the money,” News, April 5, and “With $26 million, Clinton holds huge lead in early fundraising,” News, April 2.]
Not one lead story in the past few weeks on the amazing turnout for rallies this guy is holding all over the country? The largest voter-funded campaign in history is certainly less interesting than a person who was given all their wealth, telling us how to engineer our society into their vision of a brave new future. Apparently, unless you have a huge mansion and are preaching global warming, you don’t get big headlines.
In this future, I bet they still live in huge mansions but Al Gore’s old friends, the Chinese and Native Americans, rage unchecked, polluting exponentially; while I am working two jobs to cover my carbon credits.
Choose someone who worked their way to the top: BaROCK the vote!
Paul Suver, Seattle
Yes, this guy is actually complaining that Barak Obama is not getting enough media coverage.
I do wonder if Mr. Suver could enlighten me as to Obama’s stances on topics such as: Defense, Abortion, Civil rights (including firearms ownership), Foreign policy and the drug war.
Oh wait, I forgot. People like Obama because he does have stances on tough issues. Nevermind, Suver.
I smell a rat.
Obama probably was languishing in last place, money-wise, with hundreds of thousands of his “little people” contributions which don’t pay for fuelling the bus, basically, until he went to Hollywood, and Geffen led the charge of the Big Boys, and now he’s in the chips.
Somehow, and I haven’t followed the enemy close enough to know, the Hildebeeste has pissed off the moneyed folks in Hollywood, and she didn’t get much of that action, but Obama raked it in.
Since Hollywood is a cornerstone of the culture-destroying enemy’s fortress, one may now label Obama as a culture-destroyer, with him taking the shekels of the Hollywood moguls.
Here’s a test for you who venture into the Land Of Kos and other dens of the enemy: Ask them which side Obama is on re: the renewed interest in the black community to rid itself of the gangsta rappers, a pleasant little bit of serendipity from the Affair d’Imus. If Obama hedges (he probably will) when asked if he thinks gansta rap is good for the black culture, you can bet that he has gotten his instructions from the Hollywood music crowd (big bucks there) to lay off the cash cow of Nappy-Headed Ho music.