Hooray for Jim Zumbo

Yes, the man finally gets it. And despite having endured some really over-the-top comments from firebreathing 2A supporters, he is reacting with grace and class. My hat’s off to him. 

“The last few days have been an educational experience, to say the least. My ill-conceived inflammatory blog, as all of you now know, set off a firestorm that, I’m told, has never before been equaled. I’m not proud of that.
Let me say this at the outset. My words here are from the heart, and all mine. No one can censor me, and I answer to no one but myself. And I have no one to blame but myself. Outdoor Life, a magazine that I worked for full-time as Hunting Editor for almost 30 years, fired me yesterday. My TV show was cancelled yesterday. Many of my sponsors have issued statements on their website to sever all relationships. This may cause many of you to do backflips and dance in the streets, but, of course, I’m not laughing, nor am I looking for sympathy. I don’t want a pity party.

They say hindsight is golden. Looking back, I can’t believe I said the words “ban” and “terrorist” in the context that I did. I don’t know what I was thinking when I wrote that. I can explain this as sheer ignorance and an irresponsible use of words. What I’ve learned over the last few days has enlightened and amazed me. As a guy who hunts 200 days a year, does seminars on hunting, wrote for six hunting magazines, had a hunting TV show, and wrote 20 books on hunting, how could I have been so ignorant and out of touch with reality in the world of hunting and shooting?

But I was. I really can’t explain it, maybe because I just summarily dismissed the firearms in question in my mind when I saw them in magazines and catalogs. I saw one “black” firearm in a hunting camp in all my 50 years of hunting, and I shot one last year off a boat when fishing in Alaska. To tell the truth, it was fun and I enjoyed it immensely, but I never considered one for use in hunting. I have to tell you that I have had a revelation. I’m learning that many of my pals own AR-15’s and similar firearms and indeed use them for hunting. I was totally unaware that they were being used for legitimate hunting purposes. That is the absolute truth.

My biggest regret is not the financial impact of all this. I’m almost 67 and retirement is an option. The dreadful impact here is that I inadvertently struck a spear into the hearts of the people I love most…America’s gun owners. And, even though this huge cadre of dedicated people have succeeded in stripping me of my career, I hold no grudges. I will continue to stand as firm on pro hunting as I’ve ever done. But what’s different now is that I’ll do all I can to educate others who are, or were, as ignorant as I was about “black” rifles and the controversy that surrounds them. My promise to you is that I’ll learn all I can about these firearms, and by the time this week is out, I’ll order one. The NUGE has invited me to hunt with him using AR-15’s, and I’m eager to go, and learn. I’ll do all I can to spread the word.

I understand that many of you will not accept this apology, believing that the damage has been done and there’s no way to repair it. You have that right. But let me say this. I mentioned this above, and I’ll repeat it. I’m willing to seize this opportunity to educate hunters and shooters who shared my ignorance. If you’re willing to allow me to do that, we can indeed, in my mind, form a stronger bond within our ranks. Maybe in a roundabout way we can bring something good out of this.”  – Jim Zumbo

h/t wetdogranch, where I first saw it. This may be taken from Ted Nugent’s board — at least Uncle thinks so.

I accept this apology. Had his first “apology” read like this, I think he’d still have his sponsors. It just happened too fast for him to react. According to Tom Gresham, Tom notified Jim of the fiery reaction to his initial post while Jim was still driving home from the .17-caliber tryout he mentioned. Jim (obviously) had no clue what he’d started. By the third hour of Tom’s radio program, Jim had reviewed some of the angry posts and responded with his initial apology, then went on Gresham’s show. As you can see from the transcript, neither one of them really understood at that time what was so offensive about the post.

It took a few days, but Gresham finally got it and wrote as much here. Now Zumbo as well. Good for them both, and good for the Second Amendment!

I sincerely hope there will be a strong expression of support for Jim Zumbo now from the 2A community. The above has all the words from him I could have wanted, and more. As Joe pointed out, he’s far too valuable an asset for the 2A community to lose.

Michael Bane has, as usual, excellent coverage of this whole thing, and some much-needed reflections on how the firearms industry may finally have realized that it’s shooters as well as hunters (if not more so), who pay their bills.

I hope Mr. Zumbo’s show returns within a month or so with some AR manufacturer as lead sponsor. I’m gonna guess it’ll be DPMS ’cause they sponsor the Nuge’s show. 

One last bit…I wonder who was really behind that supposed Brady blog post endorsing Zumbo’s remarks? Doesn’t seem like it was the Bradys….

This entry was posted in Heroes, Comrades and Brothers, Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

9 Responses to Hooray for Jim Zumbo

  1. EricWS says:

    A post over at Kevin Baker’s blog has the link to the Nuge’s forum on this. It looks like Ted set up a thread for Jim to apologize on, and people to respond.

    Here is the .

    I hope I did that link right.

  2. straightarrow says:

    I’m still not buying it. His epiphany didn’t occur at any time during his FORTY-TWO years as a professional in the field, but occurred overnight after he saw the financial damage he had caused himself?

    Uh huh! My father who was a conman used to say “Son, always be sincere, even when you don’t mean it.” I believe Mr. Zumbo is practicing that brand of sincerity.

    Ok, I give high marks to those in the business of writing about guns and hunting for loyalty, though it is misplaced. They need to realize they too have been betrayed by a pretender who got away with it for 42 years. Loyalty is a two way street, or at least it should be. Where was Zumbo’s?

    Naw, I ain’t buying it.

  3. Windy Wilson says:

    He still stepped in it big time, he tracked it throughout my house all over my clean carpet, and this “apology” does not even begin to clean it up.

  4. dagamore says:

    Dont buy it, wont buy it, this is not the first time he as come out against BSBR(Big Scary Black Rifles). During the lead up to the AWB he was all for it, and it looks like he still does not get that important part of the 2A. you know the part about “Shal Not Be Infringed”.

  5. Sailorcurt says:

    I believe that he’s sincere, but he still misses the point.

    He still anchors the “appropriateness” of a particular firearm to hunting. He acknowledges the viability of military pattern semi-autos ONLY because he has realized that they are actually OK to hunt with.

    The obvious conclusion is that, had he decided that they WEREN’T OK to hunt with, they would still be on his “OK to ban” list. The secondary obvious conclusion is that any firearm that ISN’T OK to hunt with in his esteemed estimation, should be banned.

    So the .380 that the little old lady uses to protect herself should be banned. The .50 BMG that the Marine Corps Vet uses to compete in long range rifle competitions should be banned. The 9mm carbine that I use to knock over tin cans and ping metal targets at the range should be banned.

    BS

    HUNTING IS NOT THE ISSUE. Hunting is just one method among many that may be chosen to express one’s Second Amendment rights.

    As long as he only views HIS particular method as legitimate, he is an enemy of the Second Amendment. And that makes him an enemy of mine.

  6. Wesley says:

    He still doesn’t understand exactly why people were upset.

    He said, “I was totally unaware that they were being used for legitimate hunting purposes. That is the absolute truth.”

    In this statement, he admits that in his mind, that firearms are only good if they are for “legitimate hunting purposes”. He still doesn’t understand that it’s this attitude that upset so many second amendment supporters. Like a lot of hunter gun owners, they don’t understand that the second amendment is about self protection from criminals and governmental enemies foreign and domestic.

  7. DirtCrashr says:

    He can come hunt in California all he wants because we have those very prohibitions he likes so much…Welcome to Zumbofornia everybody.

  8. Rivrdog says:

    Protect your ears, I’m going to shout this to the heavens:

    THAT IS NOT AN APOLOGY, THE MAN NEVER MENTIONED THE SECOND AMENDMENT EVEN ONCE IN HIS LETTER.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.