Proof of Generational Government Dependancy

Central Washington contains the reservation of the Yakima Indian Tribe. Tribes have historically had problems with alcohol overuse/abuse and the Yakima Tribe is no different.

One thing that is different is that in the fed’s 1855 Treaty with the tribe, sales of alcohol on the reservation were banned. However, due to the demands of the market, such sales take place at over 40 places of business within the Reservation proper.

Despite the fact that the tribe has their own police force which is responsible for enforcing the laws, tribal activist, Marlene White, blames the fed for not enforcing the treaty’s alcohol ban. In fact, she is going to court over it.

“There has been no enforcement,” White says. “When we first started the alcohol ban in reference to our treaty, we were successful in getting rid of the state liquor stores, but since then nothing has been done.”

Earlier this month, she filed a lawsuit in U.S. District Court in Yakima seeking a court order after witnessing alcohol sales at Harold’s General Merchandise and the Spur Tavern, both situated deep within the reservation boundaries in Harrah.

Tribal attorney Jack Fiander considers it a straightforward case and expects a decision in about six months.

In fighting such cases, many tribes have been successful in regulating and taxing alcohol on their reservations.

But in banning alcohol, most of those tribes have lacked the legal power the Yakamas have in their treaty, Fiander said.

(snip)

Toppenish City Councilwoman Elaine Willman — also director of a local group formed to combat the alcohol ban — said the tribe will have a fight on its hands if it attempts to enforce the ban on non-Indians.

She contends that non-
Indians on nontribal land within the reservation are under state, not tribal, jurisdiction.

“If it is to extend tribal jurisdiction over non-Indians on this checkerboard (of land ownership) reservation, then they’re barking up the wrong tree again,” she said. “They know they’re going to get a fight because they know they are exceeding their authority, treaty or not.”

But White says alcohol has caused only harm to tribal members since being brought here more than 150 years ago.

“We don’t want to infringe on anyone’s rights,” she said. “It has infringed on our rights.”

Frankly, I do not see how an inanimate fluid can infringe on anyone’s rights. But then again, I do not depend on the fed to do something that I am able to control; my consumption of alcohol.

Go ahead, call alcoholism a “disease” instead of what it really is. Call it a “mental disease” if you want to, but you’ll still be fooling yourself.

Alcohol dependancy is a learned behavior. Any other title you may believe it to be is just psychobabble thought up to take the blame off of where it rests, on the drinker, to make them “feeeel” less shitty about what they’ve done to themselves and the people around them. No one makes the drinker buy it and no one is pouring the shit down down their throats.

And it is precisely psychobabble such as this that helps perpetuate alcohol dependancy.

Alcohol is not “habit forming”. People are habit forming. Alcohol is poison and the body rejects it as such. That funny sensation called “A Buzz” is you brain slowly being killed.

Marlene White has figured out that her tribal police have no responsibility to follow or enforce the laws, so now she is going after The Great White Father to come bring his blue-shirted paleface men to town and stop people from hurting themselves, when she would be better off reminding the tribal leaders that their job is to lead.

And it all goes to show that once someone is allowed to rely on government, they will rarely, if ever, break that addicition on their own. Whether it is free food, free housing, free transportation or free medical care. It is just as harmful as heroin, except that the only person who pays for it monetarily is the productive citizen via their taxes.

And just to add on to that point; it is perpetuated by the liberal, who faults the US Government for not protecting the “Native Americans” from the ravages of alcohol just as they believe that the federal government has an obligation to give people free stuff.

This entry was posted in Freaks, Mutants, and Morons. Bookmark the permalink.

5 Responses to Proof of Generational Government Dependancy

  1. Rivrdog says:

    Of course, Phil, if this idiot wins her lawsuit, all the tribal business that depends on not only alcohol, but non-tribal members coming onto the reservation will be damaged.

    Brief internet research shows me at least 4 tribal casinos in Yakima, and ALL of them will be damaged, or even put out of business if they can’t serve booze.

    Since the economy of the tribe would not survive losing the casino revenue, what the woman wants to do is put the tribe back into the 1855 mode. Netting their meager share of salmon out of the nearby Columbia River isn’t going to support the tribe.

    My guess is that the whole thing is a power play amongst tribal leaders, and they are playing for keeps.

    Native Americans were always great gamblers.

  2. Tom says:

    Cool, does that mean my WA CPL is now valid on the Res?

  3. Tom says:

    She contends that non-
    Indians on nontribal land within the reservation are under state, not tribal, jurisdiction.

    Let’s try this again… Cool, does that mean my WA CPL is now valid on the Res?

  4. Sailorcurt says:

    Alcohol is not “habit forming”. People are habit forming. Alcohol is poison and the body rejects it as such. That funny sensation called “A Buzz” is you brain slowly being killed.

    I agreed with everything up to that point. I assume you have never seen anyone going through alcohol withdrawals. If you had, you might not be so quick to dismiss it as not “habit forming”.

    I am not disregarding the person’s responsibility for getting themselves into that condition, only contending that the condition does, in fact, exist.

    It is possible to quit smoking too (I did it) but that does not demonstrate that nicotine is not “habit forming”. I was addicted and it took enormous will power to quit. Alcohol is the same way except that it also makes you physically ill when you try to break the addiction. The physical withdrawal symptoms can kill some people if their addiction is bad enough.

    Also, I would contend that some people are genetically predisposed to addictive behavior. To assume that everyone is psychologically and physiologically the same as you in that respect just because the difference is not as obvious as differing hair color, or height, or a genetic deformity is pretty arrogant.

    Addictions cause imbalances in brain chemicals (I don’t buy the contention that the imbalances cause the addictions, I think the addictions cause the imbalances) but some people are simply more susceptible to that than others. They flat out CANNOT indulge in behaviors that others can do with impunity because they become addicted so easily. It is not a matter of self-will, it is a matter of genetic differences making them more susceptible.

    If you discount those differences, I challenge you to, say, compete in the next Olympics as a sprinter. If you have enough will power, you should be able to get your body into just as good a shape as any other olympic sprinter right? Oh, you say you just don’t have the aptitude for that? But why would that be…perhaps genetic predispositions?

    Again, I’m not relieving addicts from their own responsibilities. There are proven successful treatments for addiction and if they choose not to avail themselves of those treatments, then their addictions are fully and completely there responsibility.

  5. Sailorcurt says:

    Oh, and one more point:

    And it is precisely psychobabble such as this that helps perpetuate alcohol dependancy.

    Actually, what perpetuates alcohol dependency is the false belief that someone predisposed to dependency can control it if they really want to.

    The first step for an addict to beat the addiction is for them to admit and truly believe that they CANNOT control it. Belief in the fact that if they take just one drink, just one puff, just one pill, that they will not be able to stop.

    They have to swear off the substances completely. People misleading them into believing that they can control it if only they try hard enough encourages them to continue to try…and fail. The mythical belief that it is within their control is what perpetuates addiction, not the demonstrated fact that they cannot control it once they start.

    The part that they can control is that FIRST drink, the FIRST puff, the FIRST pill. That is within their control…after that, all bets are off.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.