Danny Westneat spoke without the proper knowledge of the situation.
When deputies asked to talk to David Crable, he wouldn’t come out of the house, according to the report. After numerous attempts, Crable relented and agreed to speak with the deputies, who asked him whether he had any weapons. He responded “he had enough weapons to have taken us out at anytime,” the report states.
A deputy in the sheriff’s Domestic Violence Unit told the responding officers to leave the weapons in the house, according to a report of the incident.
Crable was charged with assault and malicious mischief. When he was released on bail, the judge ordered that he not possess any weapons.
He ultimately pleaded guilty to malicious mischief and weapons charges in connection with the knife. A Superior Court judge sentenced Grable to one year in jail on each count but suspended 364 days on both sentences. The judge also placed him on probation for two years, ordered him to pay fines and restitution, attend parenting classes and have “no hostile contact” with his brother, according to court records.
But in the plea agreement, there was no indication that Crable was barred from possessing firearms. Under state law, his conviction did not preclude him from owning guns.
When existing laws are not enforced because the prosecutor on the prior case wanted to get a plea instead of going to court to convict the man for what he was actually guilty of, it is not the fault of the inanimate objects or that of law abiding gun owners that the man repeats the offense with the weapons that were not removed from his possession.
Danny Westneat can go lick balls.
Wait… wait… are you saying, Phil, that if someone commits a felony they should (wait for it) be charged with one?
THAT’S RACIST!