You’re under arrest

Have your citizen put you down and come quietly.

In Connecticut, police are “arresting” firearms.

Not firearms owners, just their guns.

Grounds for seizure: “To stop a person before they commit a crime”.

Evidence needed to seize: Little to none.

A new report to the Connecticut state legislature shows police have used the state’s unique gun seizure law to confiscate more than 1,700 firearms from citizens based on suspicion that the gun owners might harm themselves or others.

The state’s law permits police to seek a warrant for seizing a citizen’s guns based on suspicion of the gun owner’s intentions, before any act of violence or lawbreaking is actually committed.

The law was first proposed in 1998, following a mass shooting at the Connecticut Lottery Corporation that left five dead, including the gunman. Since the law went into effect Oct. 1, 1999, according to new Office of Legislative Research report, police have made more than 200 documented requests for warrants to seize firearms from citizens, and only two of the requests have been denied.

The law has remained hotly debated since its passage, as some point to possible murders and suicides it may have prevented, and others worry that police would abuse the law.

“It certainly has not been abused. It may be underutilized,” Ron Pinciaro, co-executive director of Connecticut Against Gun Violence, told the Waterbury Republican American.

I’m sure that until there are no privately owned firearms in Connecticut, Mr. Pincairo will consider the law “underutilized”.

Under the statute, dubbed the “turn in your neighbor” law by opponents, any two police officers or a state prosecutor may seek a warrant, following a specified process of investigation, to confiscate guns from people deemed a risk to harming themselves or others. The vast majority of cases, however, begin when a person – usually a spouse or live-in, according to the OLR report – file a complaint.

Shortly after the law was passed, Thompson Bosee of Greenwich, Conn., had his guns and ammunition seized by police. Bosee told WND in 1999 he suspects a neighbor, with whom he has had words regarding the neighbor’s driving on Bosee’s property, might have reported him.

“They had a warrant for my guns, they arrested my guns,” said Bosee.

A member of both the NRA and the American Gunsmithing Association, Bosee said he works on his guns in his garage and is not ashamed of it.

Although Greenwich Police would not comment, they released a list of the guns and ammunition they seized from Bosee, including six handguns, three rifles, one shotgun, one submachine gun and 3,108 rounds of ammunition.

Your neighbor trespasses on your property. You tell the bastard to get the fuck off your land. He calls Law Inc. and says that you got angry at him for his trespass. Law Inc. arrives and takes all your firearms.

Sounds like a very good law if you like to trespass on your neighbors property.

So I guess that if you want to plan a home invasion, your best plan of action is to piss off the homeowner first so that he has no way to defend his or her self when you come over armed to take his property.

And I thought that the parole system empowered criminals!

This entry was posted in Too Stupid to Live. Bookmark the permalink.

5 Responses to You’re under arrest

  1. Just like orders of protection, such a system is less likely to be abused by the police in your community than by your neighbors.

    What ever happened to an officer coming by and saying “Hey, your neighbor had a complaint about you, you wanna tell us your side?” It’s effective, it gives you a chance to tell your side, and at the same time, it lets you know that the police are aware of the situation and somewhere there is going to be a record of this meeting, so if bad things happen, the police are going to have a short list of suspects.

  2. Of course, that does not mean the police are not complicit in the abuse, as they could use such powers as a last resort, rather than a first.

  3. Grumpy Old Ham says:

    “Department of Pre-Crime”, anyone?

    YGBSM. What the hell is *wrong* in New England these days?

  4. Craig says:

    Passive agressive law enforcement in the name of law breakers….sounds like normal operations for demo government.

  5. Mikee says:

    This is a law ripe for (ab)use by anonymous tipsters AGAINST local prosecutors, police, judges, government officials, and leftist activists. File “tip” after “tip”, anonymously of course, preferably in writing with a certified delivery, and watch the interesting mayhem ensue as judges are stripped of their self-defense firearms, police are stripped of their work tools, and activists find themselves stripped of 2nd Amendment rights.

    Think the powers that be won’t go along with this? Try sending a stack of your anonymous tips, with the certified dates of delivery, to the local papaers and TV news. See how fast the law is used, or killed, after these complaints (and lack of actions upon them) are publicized.

    Or just post an anonymous complaint against yourself, then sue for relief under that “due process” clause in the US constitution. I can’t imagine this law would pass any form of scrutiny against a constitutional challenge.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.