Suits of Law: Part Two

My apologies for forgetting this yesterday. Had a meeting w/Frau Doktor and was harried in my postings.

Anyway…

Last November, a majority of Washington State Citizens voted for a Citizen’s Initiative to make it so that it would take a supermajority of State House and Senate votes in order to pass a tax increase.

The Summer of 2007 saw pro-tax groups and the SEIU filed an emergency motion with the state Supreme Court to try and keep the Citizen’s Initiative, I-960, off the November ballot.

Luckily for the Citizenry, the court refused to put a wall in front of democracy, and let the voters make their choice.

And choose we did. But that wasn’t good enough for the Democrats in the Senate. They’re filing a lawsuit to get it struck down.

Senate Democrats have laid the groundwork for a lawsuit against a tax-limiting initiative, with the majority leader considering the unusual step of filing her own lawsuit in hopes of making it easier for lawmakers to raise taxes.

Friday’s legal maneuver, coming in the 2008 session’s waning days, is an unusually strong sign that lawmakers have grown tired of initiative promoter Tim Eyman’s forays into limiting the Legislature’s power.

The groundwork was laid when the Senate began debate on a proposed $10 million liquor increase that would pay for drunken driving enforcement and substance abuse treatment.

The bill would have required approval from two-thirds of the Senate, because of last year’s Initiative 960, an Eyman-sponsored measure that reaffirmed higher vote thresholds for tax hikes.

Eyman opponents, including legislators, believe I-960 is illegal because it conflicts with the state constitution’s provision that the Legislature can pass bills with a simple majority. The initiative shouldn’t be allowed to alter that requirement, the argument goes, because it wasn’t a constitutional amendment.

Senate Majority Leader Lisa Brown, D-Spokane, asked Lt. Gov. Brad Owen, the Senate’s presiding officer, to rule I-960 unconstitutional for the purposes of the pending tax vote.

“A two-thirds requirement to pass certain types of bills, in my opinion, is antidemocratic and violates the Washington constitution,” Brown said. “The constitution is difficult to change, and it should be. It should remain superior to the statutes we pass.”

Owen, himself a Democrat and former state senator, returned after a huddle with lawyers and said it was up to the courts to decide the constitutionality of I-960. He also ruled that the proposed tax increase did meet the thresholds in I-960, and would require a two-thirds vote.

The tax increase then got a simple majority vote of 25-21, but was defeated because supporters couldn’t get the 33 votes needed to pass it under I-960.

First of all, I’d like to point out that Tim Eyman is a self-aggrandizing ass. Always one to take up the spotlight, he once held a press conference dressed as Darth Vader.

However, unlike the statement made by Rachel LaCorte of the AP, the lawmakers have not “grown tired of initiative promoter Tim Eyman’s forays into limiting the Legislature’s power”, the lawmakers have grown tired of the citizenry telling them to back off.

Eyman may be responsible for the writing and promotion of I-960, but the voters signed onto it so as to get it put on the ballot and then said yes to make it law because the majority feel that they are already paying enough taxes.

Washington State Citizens have been fighting to hold back the tax pen of the government since 1993, when the citizenry passed a similar bill called I-601. These same lawmakers have either suspended it by tacking “Emergency Clauses” onto non-emergency bills or just simply ignored its writ in entirety and dealt with the fallout later.

The suit will again go all the way to the state Supreme Court. And sadly, I believe it will be struck down. Our court is packed with pro-taxing power judges who party-hearty with the legislators on the left side of the Legislature.

I am hoping that Eyman and his backers will be able to publicize the hell out of it though, to show the citizens that their current elected officials holding a Democrat-majority in both houses of the state Legislature do not care what the citizen’s opinion is, they’re going to tax them more, and more, and more.

This entry was posted in The Left is Never Right. Bookmark the permalink.

4 Responses to Suits of Law: Part Two

  1. Firehand says:

    Went through the same crap here in OK some years back. PSH in monumental levels from various legislators & suckups when the thing was proposed, predictions of disaster when it passed, various BS to try to get it thrown out.

    Happily, we kept it. But every year or two, some weenie- usually a Democrat- will do some loud whining and bitching that ‘We cannot take care of the people’s business because we can’t raise taxes when we need to.’

  2. I agree completely. Eyman is a royal pain, but I voted for I-960 for a reason. And just because a tax proposal doesn’t get 2/3rds of the vote doesn’t mean it is dead, it just means it needs to either wait or go on the ballot.

    Legis-critters just don’t want to wait or risk exposing themselves to voter ire by asking the voters for more money. Cowardly pissants get my hackles up.

    I’ll be in my bunk…

  3. Mike Reitz says:

    We at the Evergreen Freedom Foundation have been blogging about this case here:

    http://www.libertylive.org/blog_main/post.php?post_id=410
    http://www.libertylive.org/blog_main/post.php?post_id=409
    http://www.libertylive.org/blog_main/post.php?post_id=406

    The two-thirds requirement for tax increases has been on the books for nearly 15 years, passed by I-601 and reaffirmed by I-960. Lawmakers could simply repeal the statute if they dislike the restriction on their taxing power, but prefer to let the courts face the political consequences.

    -mike

  4. Rivrdog says:

    Initiative & Referendum have been castrated by the libtards.

    In the Second Republic, they will be added to the Bill of Rights…

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.