No matter the lack of solid evidence

It must be true. Mother Gaia says so.

I have to hand it to these asses; No matter what logic or facts are thrown at them, they will not back down. Kind of like Tom Petty, but they’re smoking something different. Probably AlGore’s ass. Or maybe monkey-pole.

Hurricanes are forming twice as often as they did a century ago, largely because of global warming caused by humans, according to a new scientific study.

The study, conducted by two respected researchers and scheduled to be released today in a peer-reviewed publication, found that four hurricanes and two tropical storms developed during an average year between 1900 and 1930.

Between 1995 and 2005, however, the average shot up to eight hurricanes and seven tropical storms, the report said.

The scientists attributed the sharp increases to warmer ocean temperatures and altered wind patterns linked to human-induced global warming.

“When you look at the numbers and the strong relationship to sea-surface temperatures and the reality of global warming, you end up with a causal link that can’t be denied,” said Greg Holland, co-author of the report and a scientist at the National Center for Atmospheric Research in Boulder, Colo.

But other experts said the study by Holland and Peter Webster of the Georgia Institute of Technology is undermined by “sloppy” research.

In short, it may not be that many more hurricanes are forming now than a century ago, said the critics, who agree that global warming is occurring but believe it has not significantly affected hurricane development.

They see a much simpler reason for the higher number of reported hurricanes: The storms, they say, are more easily and frequently detected since hurricane-hunter flights began in the 1940s and weather satellites began providing data in the 1970s.

“The new paper by Holland and Webster is sloppy science that neglects the fact that better monitoring by satellites allows us to observe storms and hurricanes that were simply missed earlier,” said Chris Landsea of the National Hurricane Center.

In addition, Landsea and some other scientists said, long-term natural cycles that involve wind and ocean currents — and are unrelated to global warming — are mostly responsible for the upswing in hurricane activity since 1995.

In their paper, scheduled to be published online today in Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Holland and Webster acknowledged that their analysis was “broad brush” but insisted that natural cycles and observation errors cannot fully explain the increase in hurricane frequency.

“The reasonable estimates of data problems in the early years do not change any of the conclusions,” Holland said in an interview.

I’m sorry, let me translate that last quote: “La-la-la-la! I can’t hear you! You’re a poopy head!”

It takes a child’s mind to believe their theory. And I’m sure they’ll have many, many adults who will believe it.

I’m also sure that they’ll get future income from those adults who believe and also have the purse strings at universities.

This entry was posted in The Global Warming Death Cult. Bookmark the permalink.

6 Responses to No matter the lack of solid evidence

  1. Christopher says:

    “When you look at the numbers and the strong relationship to sea-surface temperatures and the reality of global warming, you end up with a causal link that can’t be denied,”

    A causal link, that seems to have more power than a proven fact on finding them Wow, I wish that I could run the green show. I could make billions with peoples stupidity.

  2. BobG says:

    It’s all Bush’s faultâ„¢

  3. Chris says:

    BOBG, many things are Bush’s fault, but this isn’t one of them.

    I hate reading research papers when people don’t acknowledge that data gathering devices have improved over time. So that older data may be incomplete or inaccurate. It’s like saying we have twice an many earthquakes now because our equipment can now detect the smaller ones that in the past couldn’t be measured.

    I’d also be curious if the definition of hurricane (or what “storm” qualifies as a hurricane) has been changed over the years. That could impact the numbers as well.

  4. So, for the low hurricane numbers, they do the study over a longer, 30 year period. When they do the high hurricane numbers, they do it over a shorter, 10 year period.

    Can you say, “cherry picking?”

  5. BadIdeaGuy says:

    We’re all gonna die!

  6. Ragin' Dave says:

    The only way to get the Global Warming Hoax moving is to cherry pick the numbers, with a whole lot of fudging added to the mix. Hell, in order to buy into Global Warming, you have to believe that the Earth’s temps have been stable throughout it’s history, a belief which is proven to be wrong.

    It’s not so much about the eco-system any more with these freaks, it’s about the power and control they want to exert in the name of their new religion.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.