I heard that someone was found guilty of perjury yesterday but I haven’t been able to follow up on who it was.
Did they finally put Clinton on trial?
I didn’t think I’d been busy quite long enough for that to pass me by.
Oh, I guess it wasn’t him. It was some lackey named Scooter.
Btw, don’t bother bringing that point up in the leftosphere. That was all about sex, so even though he went on television and followed up lying under oath by lying to the faces of the American citizenry, it was OK.
Btw, the new position at work is getting better every day.
Also, in something of a relation to the post below this one, the Army is being the Army, and “Tits McGhee” hasn’t gotten her orders yet, so she is supposedly coming back to lend me a hand tonight. The “going away present” I gave her on Friday was a fifth of Grey Goose, so I’ll just be hoping I didn’t screw myself with my generosity.
The jury concluded that it was inconsistent with Scooter Libby’s past record of efficient and detailed administration to be so haphazard and forgetful on this particular subject, so they reject his defense of “I don’t recall”
Since that was the basis of the Clinton defense, had he been put on trial for HIS purjury, do you suppose that the jury would have come to the same conclusion?