If they’re worried about “racist” Germans not wanting them in their country, then they’re taking the wrong route to acceptance.
Germany needs to ban alcohol if it wants to prevent further sexual violence and to help North African migrants integrate into society, a Muslim pressure group has claimed.
Commenting on the Cologne sex-attack controversy, MuslimStern, which has 20,000 followers on Facebook, said its mission was to ‘highlight the way the media was using the incidents to promote racism against minorities’.
The group complained that the female victims had brought the unwanted attention to themselves by dressing in a manner that North African men were not accustomed to.
The group claimed: ‘You cannot expect to chuck a naked antelope in front of a lion and not expect it to react. It is mind boggling that with so much time spent teaching children about sex at school, they completely forget to pass on this basic biological fact.’
As a consequence of the attacks, they urged the German government to introduce a ban across the country on the consumption of alcohol.
The group also blamed women for getting attacked by inciting the young men.
And the reaction from the leftists of all this victim blaming…..?
*crickets*
Ahh yes – blame the victim! What an original concept!
Merle
In making his point he revealed the truth which everyone wants to ignore and hide. That truth is that musselmen are beasts. He is saying that they are so wild that they cannot control their primal urge. To expect that they do exercise constraint is ludicrous and anyone who thinks that is ignorant therefore are to blame for what befalls them at the hands of the mooselim.
This truth dates al the way back to the origins of that contemptible cult for they have always been brutish.
I think the current plan is “ignore them and it will go away”. But it won’t, at least not until the deportations are complete.
A couple of years ago I had the same “discussion” with a former friend, a Muslim about young women and young Muslim, IE feral, men. I told him that the obvious answer to the problem was to announce that as Muslim men were known to be unable to control themselves, they must be shot on sight, as any other rabid animals are.
Gerry – The solution that can’t be spun as “Islomophobic” is to just say “arm everyone. If some scum-bag is attacking you, ventilate him. It matters not the race or faith of the assailant.” You don’t have to ascertain that information, you respond to their actions. If, after all is said and done, there are a high percentage of a particular ethnic, racial, or religious group, well, that’s just too damn bad: they self-selected, and have shown that Darwin still has material to work with.
And yet, if I was to claim that, …”If I see some gentleman on a prayer mat, pointed at Mecca and chanting a Muslim prayer, I just can’t prevent myself from bashing his head in with a rock…” that would be racist and evil, correct? Just want to fine tune the calibration here.
My personal policy is if I hear a call for allah’s snackbar in my presence the action only ends when one of us is dead. You declare war on me, I plan on returning the favor.
Except that Muslims are not a race, and being anti-Muslim is not racist whatsoever, it’s more like being anti-Scientology or anti-Hindu. Bashing an inbred Arab on the head with a rock may be just dealing with feral vermin.
They are descendent-members of an inherited Religious Institution with no modern-era science or prohibition against cousin-marriage so they have a huge family percentage of mental defectives, and Islam as a cult is full of conflicting double-bind regulations that also spawn emotional problems and mental instability. It’s a trap they can’t even escape and if they try they are condemned to death. Cannibalism is even sanctioned, besides a whole host of horrific non-modern behaviors.
IMHO Muslims pray on a rug because the mental conditions of the belief-system cause a basic instability.